My group and I have successfully closed a perfect 21/21 short sales in the last year. The average in the state of Virginia is only 25% of short sales are successful. Call the Avery Group if you need help to avoid foreclosure. 540-250-3275 (cell)
roballey@roywheeler.com (email)
434-975-9000 (office)
Rob Alley, Realtor
The Avery Group at Roy Wheeler
540-250-3275
roballey@roywheeler.com
http://www.robsellscharlottesville.com
http://www.forestlakesliving.com
http://www.theaverygroup.com
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Charlottesville Short Sale Experts
My group and I have successfully closed a perfect 21/21 short sales in the last year. The average in the state of Virginia is only 25% of short sales are successful. Call the Avery Group if you need help to avoid foreclosure. 540-250-3275 (cell)
roballey@roywheeler.com (email)
434-975-9000 (office)
Rob Alley, Realtor
The Avery Group at Roy Wheeler
540-250-3275
roballey@roywheeler.com
http://www.robsellscharlottesville.com
http://www.forestlakesliving.com
http://www.theaverygroup.com
roballey@roywheeler.com (email)
434-975-9000 (office)
Rob Alley, Realtor
The Avery Group at Roy Wheeler
540-250-3275
roballey@roywheeler.com
http://www.robsellscharlottesville.com
http://www.forestlakesliving.com
http://www.theaverygroup.com
Indicated rates and market comment
Conventional 30 4.875 0 + 1
Conventional 15 4.500 0 + 1
FHA/VA 30 5.000 0 + 1
FHA/VA 15 5.000 0 + 0
"Bonds are modestly higher in early trading this morning, while Stocks are sinking due to more negative talk about the financial system.
In the news today, the International Monetary Fund will reportedly release new forecasts that suggest toxic assets in the US could reach about $3 Trillion, which is $1 Trillion more than the forecast three months ago. Also adding selling pressure to Stocks is word from hedge fund giant George Soros that the US banking system is insolvent and that the economy won't recover in 2009.
With Stocks under selling pressure currently and Bonds holding above a floor of support, I recommend floating for now. If the situation changes, however, I will let you know."
Submitted by Leonard Winslow of Dominion Trust Mortgage
Rob Alley, Realtor
The Avery Group at Roy Wheeler
540-250-3275
roballey@roywheeler.com
http://www.robsellscharlottesville.com/
http://www.forestlakesliving.com/
http://www.theaverygroup.com/
Conventional 15 4.500 0 + 1
FHA/VA 30 5.000 0 + 1
FHA/VA 15 5.000 0 + 0
"Bonds are modestly higher in early trading this morning, while Stocks are sinking due to more negative talk about the financial system.
In the news today, the International Monetary Fund will reportedly release new forecasts that suggest toxic assets in the US could reach about $3 Trillion, which is $1 Trillion more than the forecast three months ago. Also adding selling pressure to Stocks is word from hedge fund giant George Soros that the US banking system is insolvent and that the economy won't recover in 2009.
With Stocks under selling pressure currently and Bonds holding above a floor of support, I recommend floating for now. If the situation changes, however, I will let you know."
Submitted by Leonard Winslow of Dominion Trust Mortgage
Rob Alley, Realtor
The Avery Group at Roy Wheeler
540-250-3275
roballey@roywheeler.com
http://www.robsellscharlottesville.com/
http://www.forestlakesliving.com/
http://www.theaverygroup.com/
Indicated rates and market comment
Conventional 30 4.875 0 + 1
Conventional 15 4.500 0 + 1
FHA/VA 30 5.000 0 + 1
FHA/VA 15 5.000 0 + 0
"Bonds are modestly higher in early trading this morning, while Stocks are sinking due to more negative talk about the financial system.
In the news today, the International Monetary Fund will reportedly release new forecasts that suggest toxic assets in the US could reach about $3 Trillion, which is $1 Trillion more than the forecast three months ago. Also adding selling pressure to Stocks is word from hedge fund giant George Soros that the US banking system is insolvent and that the economy won't recover in 2009.
With Stocks under selling pressure currently and Bonds holding above a floor of support, I recommend floating for now. If the situation changes, however, I will let you know."
Submitted by Leonard Winslow of Dominion Trust Mortgage
Rob Alley, Realtor
The Avery Group at Roy Wheeler
540-250-3275
roballey@roywheeler.com
http://www.robsellscharlottesville.com/
http://www.forestlakesliving.com/
http://www.theaverygroup.com/
Conventional 15 4.500 0 + 1
FHA/VA 30 5.000 0 + 1
FHA/VA 15 5.000 0 + 0
"Bonds are modestly higher in early trading this morning, while Stocks are sinking due to more negative talk about the financial system.
In the news today, the International Monetary Fund will reportedly release new forecasts that suggest toxic assets in the US could reach about $3 Trillion, which is $1 Trillion more than the forecast three months ago. Also adding selling pressure to Stocks is word from hedge fund giant George Soros that the US banking system is insolvent and that the economy won't recover in 2009.
With Stocks under selling pressure currently and Bonds holding above a floor of support, I recommend floating for now. If the situation changes, however, I will let you know."
Submitted by Leonard Winslow of Dominion Trust Mortgage
Rob Alley, Realtor
The Avery Group at Roy Wheeler
540-250-3275
roballey@roywheeler.com
http://www.robsellscharlottesville.com/
http://www.forestlakesliving.com/
http://www.theaverygroup.com/
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Re-Defaults Still Rising
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) released their Mortgage Metrics Report for the fourth quarter of 2008 on Friday, which showed that re-default rates following loan workouts to help homeowners avoid foreclosure are still escalating.
Consistent with last quarter’s findings, the federal agencies reported re-default rates on modified mortgages were high and progressively rose during the first three quarters of 2008, with loans modified in the third quarter showing the highest re-default rates. The percentage of modified loans that were seriously delinquent (60 or more days past due) after eight months was 41 percent for loans modified in the first quarter and 46 percent for loans modified in the second quarter. The report noted that this trend appears to continue for loans modified during the third quarter as well.
In addition, the federal agencies said that credit quality continued to decline in the fourth quarter of 2008. At the end of the year, just under 90 percent of mortgages were performing, compared with 93 percent at the end of September 2008. This decline in credit quality was evident in all loan risk categories, with subprime mortgages showing the highest level of serious delinquencies.
However, the biggest percentage jump was in low-risk prime mortgages, which accounts for nearly two-thirds of all mortgages serviced by the reporting institutions. At the end of the fourth quarter, 2.4 percent of prime mortgages were seriously delinquent, more than double the 1.1 percent recorded at the end of March 2008.
The agencies said home retention actions—loan modifications and payment plans—increased by more than 11 percent in the fourth quarter. Although the number of modifications increased in the fourth quarter, they declined as a percentage of all new home retention actions, from 52 percent in the second quarter, to 43 percent in the third quarter and 40 percent in the fourth quarter. The report noted that this declining percentage may have resulted from the growing prevalence of trial modifications reported as payment plans.
Although the OCC and OTS have asked lenders to submit additional details on their loss mitigation efforts to better evaluate the effectiveness of workouts, the fourth quarter report said the reasons for rising re-default rates are not clear. As noted in the previous quarter’s report, the agencies said, high re-defaults could be a result of the worsening economy, excessive borrower leverage, or poor initial underwriting.
The report does, however, provide insights into the extent that changes in levels of monthly payments affect re-default rates. For this quarterly report, the OCC and OTS gathered re-default data on modifications in four categories: ones that (1) reduced monthly payments by more than 10 percent; (2) reduced monthly payments by 10 percent or less; (3) left monthly payments unchanged; and (4) increased monthly payments.
Overall for 2008, about 42 percent of modified loans resulted in reduced payments, 27 percent in unchanged payments, and 32 percent actually increased payments. Workouts that reduced payments increased significantly in the fourth quarter, the agencies pointed out, to more than 50 percent of all modifications.
According to the report, servicers cited several reasons for mortgage modifications that did not result in reduced payments. For example, a servicer could freeze an adjustable rate mortgage’s interest rate when the borrower faced the risk of imminent default, rather than allowing it to reset to the higher rate stated in the loan contract. Some modifications resulted in higher monthly payments because missed principal and interest payments were capitalized and added to the loan, which in more benign economic times could result in more sustainable modifications.
Servicers also said their flexibility to reduce payments was in many cases constrained by servicing agreements with the GSEs and other private investors that defined the type and the amount of modification permitted. Recent changes in some government agency and private label servicing standards, however, should afford servicers more flexibility.
The data gathered by the OCC and OTS demonstrated that re-default rates were consistently lower for modifications that resulted in lower monthly payments. When modifications decreased monthly payments by more than 10 percent, only about 23 percent of the loans became seriously delinquent six months later. By contrast, 51 percent of the loans in which payments remained unchanged were seriously delinquent after six months. And loan modifications in which payments increased, the number was 46 percent.
Comptroller of the Currency John C. Dugan, said, “This new data shows that, in the current stressful environment, modification strategies that result in unchanged or increased mortgage payments run the risk of unacceptably high re-default rates. They should only be used on a case-by-case basis where borrowers and servicers can have confidence that the modification is likely to be sustainable.”
Dugan continued, “The data also showed that modifications that reduced monthly payments significantly had much lower re-default rates. That result is fully in line with the approach taken in the administration’s Making Home Affordable program, which is based on lowering monthly payments as the means to achieve sustainable modifications.”
OTS Acting Director John E. Bowman noted that the types of loan modifications proving to be the most sustainable increased significantly from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. These modifications, which reduced homeowners’ monthly payments the most and resulted in fewer re-defaults, rose to more than 37 percent of all modifications, from 26 percent in the previous quarter.
“The trend toward lowering payments to make home mortgages more affordable is moving in the right direction,” Bowman said. “The continuing decline in credit quality underscores the need for mortgage servicers to increase their efforts to modify home mortgages. Sustainable and affordable mortgages is a goal we all share for keeping more Americans in their homes.”
Based on the results of the report, the OCC and OTS directed each of the banks and thrifts that provide data for the Mortgage Metrics report to assess their 2008 loan modifications – particularly those that increased monthly payments or left them unchanged – to ensure that criteria applied to those loans, and to loans modified in the future, result in modifications that are “affordable and sustainable.”
The quarterly Mortgage Metrics Report released jointly by the OCC and OTS covers mortgages serviced by nine large banks and four thrifts, constituting approximately two-thirds of all outstanding mortgages in the United States.
Rob Alley, Realtor
The Avery Group at Roy Wheeler
540-250-3275
roballey@roywheeler.com
http://www.robsellscharlottesville.com
http://www.forestlakesliving.com
http://www.theaverygroup.com
Consistent with last quarter’s findings, the federal agencies reported re-default rates on modified mortgages were high and progressively rose during the first three quarters of 2008, with loans modified in the third quarter showing the highest re-default rates. The percentage of modified loans that were seriously delinquent (60 or more days past due) after eight months was 41 percent for loans modified in the first quarter and 46 percent for loans modified in the second quarter. The report noted that this trend appears to continue for loans modified during the third quarter as well.
In addition, the federal agencies said that credit quality continued to decline in the fourth quarter of 2008. At the end of the year, just under 90 percent of mortgages were performing, compared with 93 percent at the end of September 2008. This decline in credit quality was evident in all loan risk categories, with subprime mortgages showing the highest level of serious delinquencies.
However, the biggest percentage jump was in low-risk prime mortgages, which accounts for nearly two-thirds of all mortgages serviced by the reporting institutions. At the end of the fourth quarter, 2.4 percent of prime mortgages were seriously delinquent, more than double the 1.1 percent recorded at the end of March 2008.
The agencies said home retention actions—loan modifications and payment plans—increased by more than 11 percent in the fourth quarter. Although the number of modifications increased in the fourth quarter, they declined as a percentage of all new home retention actions, from 52 percent in the second quarter, to 43 percent in the third quarter and 40 percent in the fourth quarter. The report noted that this declining percentage may have resulted from the growing prevalence of trial modifications reported as payment plans.
Although the OCC and OTS have asked lenders to submit additional details on their loss mitigation efforts to better evaluate the effectiveness of workouts, the fourth quarter report said the reasons for rising re-default rates are not clear. As noted in the previous quarter’s report, the agencies said, high re-defaults could be a result of the worsening economy, excessive borrower leverage, or poor initial underwriting.
The report does, however, provide insights into the extent that changes in levels of monthly payments affect re-default rates. For this quarterly report, the OCC and OTS gathered re-default data on modifications in four categories: ones that (1) reduced monthly payments by more than 10 percent; (2) reduced monthly payments by 10 percent or less; (3) left monthly payments unchanged; and (4) increased monthly payments.
Overall for 2008, about 42 percent of modified loans resulted in reduced payments, 27 percent in unchanged payments, and 32 percent actually increased payments. Workouts that reduced payments increased significantly in the fourth quarter, the agencies pointed out, to more than 50 percent of all modifications.
According to the report, servicers cited several reasons for mortgage modifications that did not result in reduced payments. For example, a servicer could freeze an adjustable rate mortgage’s interest rate when the borrower faced the risk of imminent default, rather than allowing it to reset to the higher rate stated in the loan contract. Some modifications resulted in higher monthly payments because missed principal and interest payments were capitalized and added to the loan, which in more benign economic times could result in more sustainable modifications.
Servicers also said their flexibility to reduce payments was in many cases constrained by servicing agreements with the GSEs and other private investors that defined the type and the amount of modification permitted. Recent changes in some government agency and private label servicing standards, however, should afford servicers more flexibility.
The data gathered by the OCC and OTS demonstrated that re-default rates were consistently lower for modifications that resulted in lower monthly payments. When modifications decreased monthly payments by more than 10 percent, only about 23 percent of the loans became seriously delinquent six months later. By contrast, 51 percent of the loans in which payments remained unchanged were seriously delinquent after six months. And loan modifications in which payments increased, the number was 46 percent.
Comptroller of the Currency John C. Dugan, said, “This new data shows that, in the current stressful environment, modification strategies that result in unchanged or increased mortgage payments run the risk of unacceptably high re-default rates. They should only be used on a case-by-case basis where borrowers and servicers can have confidence that the modification is likely to be sustainable.”
Dugan continued, “The data also showed that modifications that reduced monthly payments significantly had much lower re-default rates. That result is fully in line with the approach taken in the administration’s Making Home Affordable program, which is based on lowering monthly payments as the means to achieve sustainable modifications.”
OTS Acting Director John E. Bowman noted that the types of loan modifications proving to be the most sustainable increased significantly from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. These modifications, which reduced homeowners’ monthly payments the most and resulted in fewer re-defaults, rose to more than 37 percent of all modifications, from 26 percent in the previous quarter.
“The trend toward lowering payments to make home mortgages more affordable is moving in the right direction,” Bowman said. “The continuing decline in credit quality underscores the need for mortgage servicers to increase their efforts to modify home mortgages. Sustainable and affordable mortgages is a goal we all share for keeping more Americans in their homes.”
Based on the results of the report, the OCC and OTS directed each of the banks and thrifts that provide data for the Mortgage Metrics report to assess their 2008 loan modifications – particularly those that increased monthly payments or left them unchanged – to ensure that criteria applied to those loans, and to loans modified in the future, result in modifications that are “affordable and sustainable.”
The quarterly Mortgage Metrics Report released jointly by the OCC and OTS covers mortgages serviced by nine large banks and four thrifts, constituting approximately two-thirds of all outstanding mortgages in the United States.
Rob Alley, Realtor
The Avery Group at Roy Wheeler
540-250-3275
roballey@roywheeler.com
http://www.robsellscharlottesville.com
http://www.forestlakesliving.com
http://www.theaverygroup.com
Re-Defaults Still Rising
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) released their Mortgage Metrics Report for the fourth quarter of 2008 on Friday, which showed that re-default rates following loan workouts to help homeowners avoid foreclosure are still escalating.
Consistent with last quarter’s findings, the federal agencies reported re-default rates on modified mortgages were high and progressively rose during the first three quarters of 2008, with loans modified in the third quarter showing the highest re-default rates. The percentage of modified loans that were seriously delinquent (60 or more days past due) after eight months was 41 percent for loans modified in the first quarter and 46 percent for loans modified in the second quarter. The report noted that this trend appears to continue for loans modified during the third quarter as well.
In addition, the federal agencies said that credit quality continued to decline in the fourth quarter of 2008. At the end of the year, just under 90 percent of mortgages were performing, compared with 93 percent at the end of September 2008. This decline in credit quality was evident in all loan risk categories, with subprime mortgages showing the highest level of serious delinquencies.
However, the biggest percentage jump was in low-risk prime mortgages, which accounts for nearly two-thirds of all mortgages serviced by the reporting institutions. At the end of the fourth quarter, 2.4 percent of prime mortgages were seriously delinquent, more than double the 1.1 percent recorded at the end of March 2008.
The agencies said home retention actions—loan modifications and payment plans—increased by more than 11 percent in the fourth quarter. Although the number of modifications increased in the fourth quarter, they declined as a percentage of all new home retention actions, from 52 percent in the second quarter, to 43 percent in the third quarter and 40 percent in the fourth quarter. The report noted that this declining percentage may have resulted from the growing prevalence of trial modifications reported as payment plans.
Although the OCC and OTS have asked lenders to submit additional details on their loss mitigation efforts to better evaluate the effectiveness of workouts, the fourth quarter report said the reasons for rising re-default rates are not clear. As noted in the previous quarter’s report, the agencies said, high re-defaults could be a result of the worsening economy, excessive borrower leverage, or poor initial underwriting.
The report does, however, provide insights into the extent that changes in levels of monthly payments affect re-default rates. For this quarterly report, the OCC and OTS gathered re-default data on modifications in four categories: ones that (1) reduced monthly payments by more than 10 percent; (2) reduced monthly payments by 10 percent or less; (3) left monthly payments unchanged; and (4) increased monthly payments.
Overall for 2008, about 42 percent of modified loans resulted in reduced payments, 27 percent in unchanged payments, and 32 percent actually increased payments. Workouts that reduced payments increased significantly in the fourth quarter, the agencies pointed out, to more than 50 percent of all modifications.
According to the report, servicers cited several reasons for mortgage modifications that did not result in reduced payments. For example, a servicer could freeze an adjustable rate mortgage’s interest rate when the borrower faced the risk of imminent default, rather than allowing it to reset to the higher rate stated in the loan contract. Some modifications resulted in higher monthly payments because missed principal and interest payments were capitalized and added to the loan, which in more benign economic times could result in more sustainable modifications.
Servicers also said their flexibility to reduce payments was in many cases constrained by servicing agreements with the GSEs and other private investors that defined the type and the amount of modification permitted. Recent changes in some government agency and private label servicing standards, however, should afford servicers more flexibility.
The data gathered by the OCC and OTS demonstrated that re-default rates were consistently lower for modifications that resulted in lower monthly payments. When modifications decreased monthly payments by more than 10 percent, only about 23 percent of the loans became seriously delinquent six months later. By contrast, 51 percent of the loans in which payments remained unchanged were seriously delinquent after six months. And loan modifications in which payments increased, the number was 46 percent.
Comptroller of the Currency John C. Dugan, said, “This new data shows that, in the current stressful environment, modification strategies that result in unchanged or increased mortgage payments run the risk of unacceptably high re-default rates. They should only be used on a case-by-case basis where borrowers and servicers can have confidence that the modification is likely to be sustainable.”
Dugan continued, “The data also showed that modifications that reduced monthly payments significantly had much lower re-default rates. That result is fully in line with the approach taken in the administration’s Making Home Affordable program, which is based on lowering monthly payments as the means to achieve sustainable modifications.”
OTS Acting Director John E. Bowman noted that the types of loan modifications proving to be the most sustainable increased significantly from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. These modifications, which reduced homeowners’ monthly payments the most and resulted in fewer re-defaults, rose to more than 37 percent of all modifications, from 26 percent in the previous quarter.
“The trend toward lowering payments to make home mortgages more affordable is moving in the right direction,” Bowman said. “The continuing decline in credit quality underscores the need for mortgage servicers to increase their efforts to modify home mortgages. Sustainable and affordable mortgages is a goal we all share for keeping more Americans in their homes.”
Based on the results of the report, the OCC and OTS directed each of the banks and thrifts that provide data for the Mortgage Metrics report to assess their 2008 loan modifications – particularly those that increased monthly payments or left them unchanged – to ensure that criteria applied to those loans, and to loans modified in the future, result in modifications that are “affordable and sustainable.”
The quarterly Mortgage Metrics Report released jointly by the OCC and OTS covers mortgages serviced by nine large banks and four thrifts, constituting approximately two-thirds of all outstanding mortgages in the United States.
Rob Alley, Realtor
The Avery Group at Roy Wheeler
540-250-3275
roballey@roywheeler.com
http://www.robsellscharlottesville.com
http://www.forestlakesliving.com
http://www.theaverygroup.com
Consistent with last quarter’s findings, the federal agencies reported re-default rates on modified mortgages were high and progressively rose during the first three quarters of 2008, with loans modified in the third quarter showing the highest re-default rates. The percentage of modified loans that were seriously delinquent (60 or more days past due) after eight months was 41 percent for loans modified in the first quarter and 46 percent for loans modified in the second quarter. The report noted that this trend appears to continue for loans modified during the third quarter as well.
In addition, the federal agencies said that credit quality continued to decline in the fourth quarter of 2008. At the end of the year, just under 90 percent of mortgages were performing, compared with 93 percent at the end of September 2008. This decline in credit quality was evident in all loan risk categories, with subprime mortgages showing the highest level of serious delinquencies.
However, the biggest percentage jump was in low-risk prime mortgages, which accounts for nearly two-thirds of all mortgages serviced by the reporting institutions. At the end of the fourth quarter, 2.4 percent of prime mortgages were seriously delinquent, more than double the 1.1 percent recorded at the end of March 2008.
The agencies said home retention actions—loan modifications and payment plans—increased by more than 11 percent in the fourth quarter. Although the number of modifications increased in the fourth quarter, they declined as a percentage of all new home retention actions, from 52 percent in the second quarter, to 43 percent in the third quarter and 40 percent in the fourth quarter. The report noted that this declining percentage may have resulted from the growing prevalence of trial modifications reported as payment plans.
Although the OCC and OTS have asked lenders to submit additional details on their loss mitigation efforts to better evaluate the effectiveness of workouts, the fourth quarter report said the reasons for rising re-default rates are not clear. As noted in the previous quarter’s report, the agencies said, high re-defaults could be a result of the worsening economy, excessive borrower leverage, or poor initial underwriting.
The report does, however, provide insights into the extent that changes in levels of monthly payments affect re-default rates. For this quarterly report, the OCC and OTS gathered re-default data on modifications in four categories: ones that (1) reduced monthly payments by more than 10 percent; (2) reduced monthly payments by 10 percent or less; (3) left monthly payments unchanged; and (4) increased monthly payments.
Overall for 2008, about 42 percent of modified loans resulted in reduced payments, 27 percent in unchanged payments, and 32 percent actually increased payments. Workouts that reduced payments increased significantly in the fourth quarter, the agencies pointed out, to more than 50 percent of all modifications.
According to the report, servicers cited several reasons for mortgage modifications that did not result in reduced payments. For example, a servicer could freeze an adjustable rate mortgage’s interest rate when the borrower faced the risk of imminent default, rather than allowing it to reset to the higher rate stated in the loan contract. Some modifications resulted in higher monthly payments because missed principal and interest payments were capitalized and added to the loan, which in more benign economic times could result in more sustainable modifications.
Servicers also said their flexibility to reduce payments was in many cases constrained by servicing agreements with the GSEs and other private investors that defined the type and the amount of modification permitted. Recent changes in some government agency and private label servicing standards, however, should afford servicers more flexibility.
The data gathered by the OCC and OTS demonstrated that re-default rates were consistently lower for modifications that resulted in lower monthly payments. When modifications decreased monthly payments by more than 10 percent, only about 23 percent of the loans became seriously delinquent six months later. By contrast, 51 percent of the loans in which payments remained unchanged were seriously delinquent after six months. And loan modifications in which payments increased, the number was 46 percent.
Comptroller of the Currency John C. Dugan, said, “This new data shows that, in the current stressful environment, modification strategies that result in unchanged or increased mortgage payments run the risk of unacceptably high re-default rates. They should only be used on a case-by-case basis where borrowers and servicers can have confidence that the modification is likely to be sustainable.”
Dugan continued, “The data also showed that modifications that reduced monthly payments significantly had much lower re-default rates. That result is fully in line with the approach taken in the administration’s Making Home Affordable program, which is based on lowering monthly payments as the means to achieve sustainable modifications.”
OTS Acting Director John E. Bowman noted that the types of loan modifications proving to be the most sustainable increased significantly from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. These modifications, which reduced homeowners’ monthly payments the most and resulted in fewer re-defaults, rose to more than 37 percent of all modifications, from 26 percent in the previous quarter.
“The trend toward lowering payments to make home mortgages more affordable is moving in the right direction,” Bowman said. “The continuing decline in credit quality underscores the need for mortgage servicers to increase their efforts to modify home mortgages. Sustainable and affordable mortgages is a goal we all share for keeping more Americans in their homes.”
Based on the results of the report, the OCC and OTS directed each of the banks and thrifts that provide data for the Mortgage Metrics report to assess their 2008 loan modifications – particularly those that increased monthly payments or left them unchanged – to ensure that criteria applied to those loans, and to loans modified in the future, result in modifications that are “affordable and sustainable.”
The quarterly Mortgage Metrics Report released jointly by the OCC and OTS covers mortgages serviced by nine large banks and four thrifts, constituting approximately two-thirds of all outstanding mortgages in the United States.
Rob Alley, Realtor
The Avery Group at Roy Wheeler
540-250-3275
roballey@roywheeler.com
http://www.robsellscharlottesville.com
http://www.forestlakesliving.com
http://www.theaverygroup.com
Mortgage Industry Warms to Obama's Foreclosure Relief Plan
Cities across the country say they are seeing a disturbing new practice when it comes to foreclosures – more and more, banks are opting not to take possession of foreclosed properties because the costs of maintenance, repairs, and legal fees outweigh the still-declining value of the property.
According to a New York Times report published over the weekend, these bank walkaways, as they are being called, are spreading through cities across the nation, from Jacksonville, Florida, to South Bend, Indiana, and Kansas City, Missouri.
In Buffalo, New York, the Times reports that the problem has reached “epidemic” proportions in recent months. In fact, the city of Buffalo has brought a lawsuit against 37 different banks, the newspaper said, claiming they are responsible for the deterioration of more than 57 abandoned homes because they “walked away” from taking ownership of and maintaining the properties following foreclosure proceedings.
Kermit Lind, a clinical professor at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law and an expert on foreclosure law, told the Times, “It [bank walkaways] is what some of us think is the next wave of the crisis.”
According to the Times, experts suggest the bank walkaways are most visible in states where foreclosures are processed through the courts and therefore tend to be more transparent, but roughly half of the states allow foreclosures to proceed without court intervention, making it difficult to accurately count the number of bank walkaways in recent months.
While a walkaway may be the most cost-effective option for banks in today's market – given the fact that lenders can lose up to 50 percent of their investment in a foreclosure – it offers little assistance to the homeowners, who are still on the title and therefore legally responsible for the property's upkeep under city ordinances. In addition, the homeowner is usually unaware of the bank's decision not to repossess the home until after the home has already been sitting vacant, leaving it vulnerable to vandalism and contributing to neighborhood blight.
Larry Rothenberg, a lawyer for creditors' rights firm Weltman, Weinberg & Reis, explained to the Times, “Oftentimes when the foreclosure starts out, it’s a viable property, but by the time it gets to a sheriff’s sale, it might not have enough value to justify further expense. We’ve always had cases where property was vandalized or lost value, but they were rare compared to these times.”
Rob Alley, Realtor
The Avery Group at Roy Wheeler
540-250-3275
roballey@roywheeler.com
http://www.robsellscharlottesville.com
http://www.forestlakesliving.com
http://www.theaverygroup.com
According to a New York Times report published over the weekend, these bank walkaways, as they are being called, are spreading through cities across the nation, from Jacksonville, Florida, to South Bend, Indiana, and Kansas City, Missouri.
In Buffalo, New York, the Times reports that the problem has reached “epidemic” proportions in recent months. In fact, the city of Buffalo has brought a lawsuit against 37 different banks, the newspaper said, claiming they are responsible for the deterioration of more than 57 abandoned homes because they “walked away” from taking ownership of and maintaining the properties following foreclosure proceedings.
Kermit Lind, a clinical professor at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law and an expert on foreclosure law, told the Times, “It [bank walkaways] is what some of us think is the next wave of the crisis.”
According to the Times, experts suggest the bank walkaways are most visible in states where foreclosures are processed through the courts and therefore tend to be more transparent, but roughly half of the states allow foreclosures to proceed without court intervention, making it difficult to accurately count the number of bank walkaways in recent months.
While a walkaway may be the most cost-effective option for banks in today's market – given the fact that lenders can lose up to 50 percent of their investment in a foreclosure – it offers little assistance to the homeowners, who are still on the title and therefore legally responsible for the property's upkeep under city ordinances. In addition, the homeowner is usually unaware of the bank's decision not to repossess the home until after the home has already been sitting vacant, leaving it vulnerable to vandalism and contributing to neighborhood blight.
Larry Rothenberg, a lawyer for creditors' rights firm Weltman, Weinberg & Reis, explained to the Times, “Oftentimes when the foreclosure starts out, it’s a viable property, but by the time it gets to a sheriff’s sale, it might not have enough value to justify further expense. We’ve always had cases where property was vandalized or lost value, but they were rare compared to these times.”
Rob Alley, Realtor
The Avery Group at Roy Wheeler
540-250-3275
roballey@roywheeler.com
http://www.robsellscharlottesville.com
http://www.forestlakesliving.com
http://www.theaverygroup.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)